Environmental Policy and Preferences
Fesenfeld, L., Wicki, M., Sun, Y., Bernauer, T. (2020). Policy packaging can make food system transformation feasible. Nature Food, 1 173–182. DOI: 10.1038/s43016-020-0047-4
Smith, E. K., Eder, C., and Katsanidou, A. (2020). On thinning ice: understanding the knowledge, concerns and behaviors towards polar ice loss in Germany. Polar Geography, 43: 4. DOI: 10.1080/1088937X.2020.1755904
Huber, R. A., Fesenfeld, L., and Bernauer, T. (2020). Political populism, responsiveness, and public support for climate mitigation. Climate Policy, 20: 3. DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2020.1736490
Huber, R. A., Wicki, M. L., and Bernauer, T. (2020). Public support for environmental policy depends on beliefs concerning effectiveness, intrusiveness, and fairness. Environmental Politics, 29: 4. DOI: external page10.1080/09644016.2019.1629171call_made
Bernauer, T., Prakash, A., and Beiser-McGrath, L. F. (2018). Do exemptions undermine environmental policy support? An experimental stress test on the odd‐even road space rationing policy in India. Regulation & Governance. DOI: external page10.1111/rego.12225call_made
Beiser-McGrath, L., and Huber, R. A. (2018). Assessing the relative importance of psychological and demographic factors for predicting climate and environmental attitudes. Climatic Change, 149, 335–347. DOI: external page10.1007/s10584-018-2260-9call_made
Bakaki, Z. and Bernauer, T. (2018). Do economic conditions affect publis support for environmental policy?. Journal of Cleaner Production, 195, 66-78. DOI: external page10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.162call_made
Bakaki, Z., and T. Bernauer. (2016). Measuring and explaining the willingness to pay for forest conservation: evidence from a survey experiment in Brazil. Environmental Research Letters, 11(11). DOI: external page10.1088/1748-9326/11/11/114001call_made