Voluntary business initiatives can reduce public pressure for regulating firm behaviour abroad

Exploiting a unique national referendum on this issue in Switzerland, Dennis Kolcava, Lukas Rudolph and Thomas Bernauer investigate the appropriate mix of state intervention and corporate self-regulation on social/environmental aspects of firm behaviour from a public opinion standpoint. Their research was published in the Journal of European Public Policy.

by Nicolas Solenthaler

Almost all regulatory policy stops at the national border. Thus, when conducting business abroad, the behaviour of firms is regulated by their host, not their home country. Yet, international institutions have issued (non-binding) codes of conduct on social/environmental aspects of firm behaviour, and various high-income countries discuss how to improve extraterritorial firm behaviour – with high political contestation over the appropriate mix of state intervention and corporate self-regulation. Exploiting a unique national referendum on this issue in Switzerland, the researchers investigate how these interact from a public opinion standpoint. Based on a nationally representative survey experiment (N=1564), they find that while baseline support for state intervention is high (approx. 60%), corporate self-regulation decreases such support. However, only credible voluntary business initiatives lead to substantial reductions. Their results speak to a broad policy debate in European countries and the EU on how to ensure compliance of firms with human rights and environmental standards.

For more information and the full article, please visit the external pageJournal of European Public Policy homepage.

JavaScript has been disabled in your browser